Back to Lectures 23—42

Beyond Volume II · Lecture 45

Trust After Addiction

Accountability, repair and the futures that cannot be demanded

01

The human problem

Recovery may change the person who caused harm. Trust is a separate learning process in the people who lived with its consequences, and no one owes the next chapter.

Core sentence

Recovery can offer evidence; it cannot demand another person's trust as payment.

trustrepairboundariesfamily
02

What this adds

The new move

It separates recovery, trust, forgiveness, reconciliation and access, then develops accountable repair without entitlement.

03

Publication briefing

Transparent status

The canonical structure is live. The full web edition is the next editorial layer.

This page does not use filler or pretend the source manuscript has already been converted. It holds the lecture question, contribution, novel concept, practical translation and visual model so the full edition can enter without changing its URL, navigation or design system.

FH / 45Novel concept

The Relational Repairability Window

A research scaffold for asking when safety, autonomy, information, consistency and freely chosen contact make repair possible.

05

Practical translation

For reflection and conversation

Three moves that return the idea to the field.

  1. Offer evidence without demanding a verdict.
  2. Treat safety and autonomy as floors, not bargaining chips.
  3. Let non-reconciliation remain a valid outcome.

Educational translation only. Not a risk assessment, treatment plan or individualized medical advice.

One visual model

Trust updates on a different clock

The recovering person can change conduct; the loved one retains control over access, pace and interpretation.

Lecture poster

FLOW HIJACKED · 45

Trust After Addiction

Recovery can offer evidence; it cannot demand another person's trust as payment.
01recovery action02evidence over time03safety04free choice05possible trust
Conceptual visual model · not a diagnostic instrument

Research anchors

Lineage, evidence and limits

Sources this page is thinking with

This is a focused set of sources doing conceptual work on the page, not a systematic review or exhaustive bibliography. The Research Library adds summaries, themes and cross-lecture links.

  1. Coan, J. A. & Sbarra, D. A. (2015).Social Baseline Theory: The social regulation of risk and effort.Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 87–91.DOI ↗
Explore in the Research Library

Citation does not imply that a source validates the complete Flow Hijacked synthesis.

Full editions

The source remains available beside the web edition.

Full illustrated source editions on Google Drive

Return to Volume II